CHINA AND TAIWAN SHOW WILLINGNESS TO REOPEN TALKS
(Straits Times 2005-02-03)

BEIJING and Taipei yesterday showed their common desire to reopen talks when they paid their last respects to Taiwan's chief cross-strait negotiator, Mr Koo Chen-fu.

China showed its willingness to do so by sending two senior officials from the Cabinet-level Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) to
attend Mr Koo's funeral in Taipei yesterday.

Mr Sun Yafu and Mr Li Yafei, who are TAO deputy director and bureau chief respectively, are the highest-ranking Chinese officials to set foot in Taiwan since 1999.

Although they deliberately kept a low profile, their visit was regarded widely as a strong gesture of goodwill from Beijing.

Taipei yesterday reciprocated by extending an invitation to Mr Wang Daohan, Mr Koo's Chinese counterpart, to visit the island.

Although Taiwan has repeatedly said it would welcome a visit by Mr Wang, this is the first time that President Chen Shui-bian has issued the invitation personally.

However, in the official eulogy he delivered at Mr Koo's memorial service yesterday, Mr Chen did not mention the consensus on ""one China'' which Mr Koo and Mr Wang hammered out at a 1992 meeting in Hong Kong.

To Beijing, that consensus was Mr Koo's greatest contribution and most important legacy, for it culminated in the 1993 landmark cross-strait talks in Singapore.

It was this achievement that prompted the Chinese leadership to send such a senior delegation to attend Mr Koo's funeral.

During his brief stay in Taipei, Mr Sun twice reminded the Taiwanese of this contribution to cross-strait relations.

In China's view, a eulogy on Mr Koo without mentioning the consensus was not a careless omission, but a indication of the
Taiwanese government's refusal to recognise such an agreement.

That was somewhat disappointing to Beijing.

Although the TAO insisted that the visit by Messrs Sun and Li was strictly personal to mourn Mr Koo on Mr Wang's behalf yet their official capacity authorised them to jumpstart cross-strait talks if necessary.

The two men had been involved in various levels of cross-strait dialogue that was initiated by Mr Koo and Mr Wang.

According to Professor Xu Bodong, director of the Taiwan Studies Institute of Beijing Union University, the Chinese side had initially thought of sending Mr Tang Shubei, a retired TAO vice-director, so as to downplay the political connotation of such a visit.

However, they later decided to send two senior serving officials so that they could reopen cross-strait dialogue immediately if Mr Chen made some positive references to the ""1992 consensus'' a precondition China has set for the resumption of talks.

Prof Xu, who was privy to China's cross-strait policymaking process, said Beijing wanted to signal its readiness to reopen talks anytime if the necessary conditions were in place.

He disclosed that Mr Sun and Mr Li were even prepared to extend their stay in Taipei should Mr Chen make ""the appropriate overture''.

The Taiwanese leader said in his National Day speech last year that he was willing to resume dialogue with Beijing ""on the model of the 1992 Hong Kong meeting''.

But he has repeatedly denied that a consensus was reached at that meeting.

Prof Xu suggested that an appropriate overture would be to rephrase it to ""the 1992 consensus on one China''.

But that did not happen, and the two Chinese officials left Taipei yesterday as scheduled.

However, remarks made by Mr Sun prior to their departure hinted that the door remained open for the resumption of cross-strait talks.

""It is our desire to promote peaceful and stable cross-stra it relations,'' Mr Sun said at Taipei airport yesterday.

""After all these years, we increasingly feel that further bilateral exchanges are needed in order to promote cross-strait
relations so that it can develop in the right direction.''

He promised to take back what he saw, heard and felt and report them to Mr Wang.

The positive tone showed he did not want to close the door to cross-strait dialogue even though Mr Chen evaded the ""1992 consensus'' on one China.

<< 返 回