THE Americans had a hand in the
consensus reached between Taiwan's ruling and opposition
parties last week.
The most salient feature of the
10-point consensus, signed by Taiwan President
Chen Shui-bian and People First Party (PFP) chairman
James Soong, obliged the former to renounce de
jure independence publicly during his term, which
ends in 2008.
Mr Soong admitted openly that
the United States played an important role in bringing
about the consensus.
Asked by journalists about this,
he said: ""Do you think President Chen
will talk to me without the Americans?'' At a
separate press conference, he disclosed that during his month-long stay
in the US in December, ""very highly placed US officials told
me that the cross-strait situation was far more serious than the Taiwanese
authorities assumed''.
He did not say who the officials
were, but Taiwanese media reported that he had
met the undersecretaries of the state and
defence departments.
His US trip had also coincided
with the visit of Mr Chen Yunlin, director of China's
Taiwan Affairs Office, prompting the Taiwanese
media to speculate that he might have met Beijing's
representatives secretly.
Mr Soong said the US officials
warned that ""the cross-strait situation
was very delicate'' and that they were very concerned
about Beijing's anti-secession law, which is expected to be passed this
month, and Taipei's constitutional amendments next month.
They told him unequivocally that
the US would not fight for Taiwan if it declared
independence.
""Without American help,
can Taiwan fight a war with China? Don't try to
kid yourself,'' Mr Soong quoted an American official
as saying.
He said the officials even used
foul language when referring to President Chen.
Mr Soong then asked for the US
bottom line. ""Peaceful unification,
no war, preserve Taiwan to pin down China,'' he
quoted
the US official as saying.
With that information, Mr Soong
told President Chen that the US could not afford
to lose Japan. But in order to preserve Japan,
the US must preserve Taiwan first.
If Taiwan were to be annexed by
the mainland, then Japan could not be preserved.
Hence, the best outcome would be to maintain the
present status quo.
Mr Soong was still in the US when
news broke that he and President Chen might hold
their first meeting in four years.
It is clear from the PFP chief's
remarks that Washington was behind the Chen-Soong
meeting last Thursday.
An official from Taiwan's main
opposition party, Kuomintang (KMT), went so far
as to say that the meeting was in fact
masterminded by the US because it served American interests in three
ways.
First, it helped put a brake on
runaway separatism in Taiwan, thereby averting
an imminent cross-strait crisis.
The US certainly would not like
to confront China at a time when it was still entangled
in the Middle East and when the North Korean nuclear
crisis was worsening.
The consensus helped to remove
the immediate risk of war in the Taiwan Strait.
The US can now say that the onus
of maintaining peace and stability in the area
rests with China.
Second, the meeting served as
a stern warning to Mr Chen.
By elevating Mr Soong's political
status, the US was sending a veiled warning to
the President that should he remain wayward, as
he had done before by ignoring American warnings,
Washington could replace him with a ""spare
tyre''.
""History has seen the
US toppling regimes that were not compliant enough
and replacing them with their political opponents,''
the KMT official told The Straits Times.
Third, in exchange for raising
Mr Soong's political profile, the PFP might relax
its opposition to Washington's massive arms sales
to Taiwan.
Following last Thursday's meeting,
Taiwan's Defence Minister Lee Jye said he would
meet Mr Soong to get his support for the arms deal.
The KMT, which was totally excluded
from the consensus-building talks, was extremely
bitter.
A KMT official said the PFP chief
was nothing more than a US proxy.
""The Chen-Soong consensus
should be more appropriately termed the Chen and
US-proxy consensus,'' said the official.
|