About Us News OpenLetter Profile Gallery Article OtherArticle Interview Contact Us Meeting

Medical parole, petition only hope

 

 
MARTIN WONG
 

2006-11-25

A petition to the mainland's highest legal authorities and medical parole are the only two avenues still open to Ching Cheong for early release, legal experts say.

Ong Yew-kim, a mainland law expert at Hong Kong's Chinese University, said the failed appeal was the last judicial procedure available to Ching to challenge his conviction on spying for Taiwan.

In China, we only have two trials for a case, he said. The ruling is final. But Ching could still petition the Supreme Court of the People's Republic of China, the Supreme People's Procuratorate, or the premier or president, Mr Ong said.

He said a petition was a means of appeal when every judicial procedure had failed, although Ching's chances were slim. It is not unique to mainland China. It exists in many places, he said.

Michael Jackson, of the University of Hong Kong's law department, pointed out that petitions were also possible in Hong Kong.

If you run out of all the means to overturn your case, you can send a petition to the chief executive, urging him to look into the matter, he said. This follows the practice in England.

 

 

Mr Ong said Ching or his family could write what they liked in the petition. They can state what went wrong in the trials, provide evidence that they think can prove Ching is innocent, or talk about his good character, he said. But China's system is so unhealthy, I do not think he could be set free like that.

Mr Ong believed Ching had a good chance of being released on medical parole.

Ching has been behind bars for quite a while and is in poor health. Besides, China has a practice of allowing people free on medical parole ... which I do not want to elaborate here, he said, adding that he was deeply disappointed by the appeal's result.

The court had no sufficient evidence to convict Ching for spying in the first place. The appeal only made a ruling based on the mistakes of the first trial, he said.

We dream night and day of an independent judiciary in China. Judging from this case, we can dismiss such thoughts now.?

 

Copyright (c) 2000. South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.

 

文章編號: 200611250270047
返回主菜單

本文章版權屬於 南華早報 所有,現由慧科訊業有限公司發放,如需轉發,必須獲該報同意。版權所有,翻印必究。

<< 返 回